Three things I wrote ages ago on weblogs, publishing and community...
For a variety of reasons I've been digging up some old stuff on the publishing of weblogs that I've written on this site of for conferences or whatever, and I thought I'd reference them again here because I was surprised by how much I still agree with them (and how much they're still relevant) even though they're a couple of years old:
- Some ways that mainstream web media can interact with the "revolution" in personal publishing… (Powerpoint - 3Mb-ish)
"Rather than treating weblogs as an object to be studied or as a territory to be claimed, mainstream publishers should be looking to build tools that increase interaction between the two types of site - making both better in the process… - On super-distributed and
super-localised online communities (Powerpoint - 5Mb-ish)
"The weblog world is a super-distributed community where - much like newspaper columnists - there are ongoing and involved discussions and conversations happening not on one site - but distributed across many hundreds of thousands of sites, each one radically personalised - a representation of its creator in cyberspace…" - Why Content Publishers shouldn't host weblogs (February 2003)
"There is no reason to assume that being in the position to encourage the take-up of weblogging will mean that you'll keep the ones you want to keep using your service. In fact: 1. The longer someone has been weblogging, and the more invested they are in it, the more likely it is that they're going to want to get a domain name of their own. 2. These same people are also likely to want to use extended functionality at some point and will probably try and move to a dedicated application or provider who can more adequately fulfil their weblogging needs. 3. A dedicated long-term weblogger may not wish to be associated with the brand of your service any more and may choose to leave."
Comments
Please stay on-topic, informative and polite. I reserve the right to remove comments for whatever vague capricious reasons seem reasonable at the time.
The first ppt was really great. Thank alot for sharing.
→ Posted by: Jens at February 15, 2005 3:49 PM