Follow tomcoates on Twitter
A weblog by Tom Coates concerning future media, social software and the web of data
Quote of the month: "This is not a brothel, there are no prostitutes here"
You can explore the archives, read the disclaimer or subscribe to an RSS feed

A few odd bits of detective work...

Posted October 4, 2005 9:28 PM.

So after accepting their apology late last night I should probably really let this one lie, but I just thought people might be interested in a couple of updates. I'm going to have a phone conversation with the people from Cohn Wolfe later in the week or next week (quick point of order - nasty website with a horrible flash intro - easily fixable too), and I'll be asking them a little bit about how this happened and probably trying to give them some suggestions on how they can avoid this kind of thing in future.

In the meantime, for those few of you who were interested in piecing together some of the other final details about how it all fits together - I got a really interesting e-mail from a couple of people on other sites about comments they'd received from the same e-mail address as my Barry Scott in which the guy concerned specifically talked about the fake weblog, so there's another connection there (thanks particularly to the b3tans). But more importantly after a really interesting suggestion from a commenter called "Lou" over on the apology thread, I had a dig around in the 'long headers' of the e-mails I got from the people at Cohn Wolfe for IP addresses and the like - and what did I find:

Received: from lon30ex01.yr.com (HELO lon30ex01.emea.corp.yr.com) (213.86.119.211)

If you remember from this post the IP address of the original Barry Scott commenter on the site was 213.86.119.210, and Sam Spade correlated that with lon30ex01.yr.com. So I guess, my friends, that we have a winner!

All this detective work is really quite good fun. I should run a little masterclass or something in the kinds of things you can find out online. Anyway, that's pretty much it for the moment. My acceptance of the apology still stands but I just thought people might find those particular connections interesting.

And the final thing is that I saw the bloody Cillit Bang advert for the first time this evening! God it's appalling! Why did no one tell me!?

Comments

Please stay on-topic, informative and polite. I reserve the right to remove comments for whatever vague capricious reasons seem reasonable at the time.

Don't tell me you haven't seen the hardcore techno remix of the Cillit Bang ad?

Posted by: robotperson at October 4, 2005 11:21 PM

By the way, Tom, talking of B3taen help, Rob Manuel did a talk in Islington on Sunday and explained the whole story.

Posted by: Alex at October 5, 2005 10:57 AM

Come on, Tom. A product called "Cillit Bang", a fictional promoter called "Barry Scott", and a weblog all about his life?! How could you have ever imagined that the product's advertisements could be anything BUT completely appalling! They don't even have the mildly self-mocking tone of the recent "Vanish" adverts. Face it, this is sub-QVC, Men and Motors, Fox News-graded crap!

Posted by: Newfred at October 5, 2005 3:30 PM

I don't really watch ITV much, and I'd forgotten how tacky the whole enterprise was I guess. I don't think they advertise it on Channel 4 (oh beautiful Channel 4). Do I sound like a snob yet?

Posted by: Tom Coates at October 5, 2005 10:27 PM

The Cillit bang remix is good but the esure remix by the same guy is even better;
http://simonandrews.typepad.com/big_picture/2005/05/consumers_remix.html

Posted by: Simon Andrews at October 5, 2005 11:27 PM

Don't let this lie Tom.

It sets a bad, bad precedent.

Posted by: TimK at October 8, 2005 4:38 PM

Want to add your opinion?

© 1999-2007 Tom Coates