Please stay on-topic, informative and polite. I reserve the right to remove comments for whatever vague capricious reasons seem reasonable at the time.
Not that I'm a pro chip designer, but I know the basics, and it sure doesn't make much sense to me. Except, perhaps, design wise - just adding more cores instead of designing a new core (and a new).. A single core is better than multicore for pretty much every application I can think about, at least in the consumer market, anyway.
I bet it's kinda like those hair schampoos that always "improve their formulas", at least for ordinary people.. just trying to keep the hype to keep up the price on a product that people doesn't really need further development from.
Comments
Please stay on-topic, informative and polite. I reserve the right to remove comments for whatever vague capricious reasons seem reasonable at the time.
Not that I'm a pro chip designer, but I know the basics, and it sure doesn't make much sense to me. Except, perhaps, design wise - just adding more cores instead of designing a new core (and a new).. A single core is better than multicore for pretty much every application I can think about, at least in the consumer market, anyway.
I bet it's kinda like those hair schampoos that always "improve their formulas", at least for ordinary people.. just trying to keep the hype to keep up the price on a product that people doesn't really need further development from.
→ Posted by: Daniel Gr at February 13, 2007 5:38 PM